A Resolution to Ban Known and Potential Carcinogenic Additives in Processed Foods

WGA/2/10

Sponsored by Evelyn Wang, Olivia Wallace, Miranova Yoneyama, Marly Mallory of Franklin High School

The delegates above represented the Delegation of Netherlands.

This legislation was filed in the Social, Humanitarian and Cultural category

Presented as part of the MUN B 2023 conference

1 Acknowledging that the second UN Sustainable Development Goal aims to provide people with
2 regular access to safe and nutritious food,
3
4 Realizing that there are currently a large number of known and potential carcinogenic additives in
5 processed food,
6
7 Understanding the adverse effects of ingesting carcinogenic additives include higher risks of
8 cancer, links to obesity, and interference with growth hormones and development,
9
10 Emphasizing that the UN has already identified food to be a priority area for consumer health and
11 the Codex Alimentarius to be the point of reference regarding food guidelines in resolution 39/248,
12
13 Conscious that the European Food Safety Authority has implemented stricter regulations on
14 additives in the European Commission’s General Food Law than the current Codex Alimentarius,
15 We the Delegation of Netherlands 2 Hereby:
16
17 Requests that the Codex Alimentarius prohibit known and potential carcinogenic additives from
18 being used in processed foods;
19
20 Recognizes all additives that are found to be harmful or potentially harmful in the future be added
21 to the amendment as additives that cannot be used in processed foods;
22
23 Calls upon the member states to adopt these guidelines;
24
25 Encourages countries to perform annual inspections and audits to ensure that processed food
26 remains safe for all people;
27
28 Urges nations to impose punishments for violations such as fines and product recalls in order to
29 uphold the policy;
30
31 Recommends that foods with deceptive marketing regarding their ingredients should face stricter
32 legal measures, potentially including criminal prosecution;
33
34 Endorses that repeated violations of food safety regulations should be met with suspension or
35 revocation of licenses of those food establishments or manufacturers to operate until they
36 demonstrate compliance.
37
38